Prediction of Calum Puttergill vs Scott Browne Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Puttergill vs S. Browne

Calum Puttergill
AUS
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
35
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
888
C. Rank
Ret.
663
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Ambidextrous

Scott Browne
AUS
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
35
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
888
C. Rank
Ret.
663
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Ambidextrous
Head-to-head: Puttergill 2 - 0 Browne
They have played 4 sets in total, with Calum Puttergill winning 4 and Scott Browne winning 0. The last match between Calum Puttergill and Scott Browne was at the Australia F8, 12-10-2015, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Calum Puttergill getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Puttergill | 2 |
| Browne | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q2) Australia F8(10-12-15)
Calum Puttergill
6
6
Scott Browne
1
2
(R1) Australia F9(10-07-13)
Calum Puttergill
6
6
Scott Browne
1
1
C. Puttergill vs S. Browne H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.13% (170-176) | Career Total W/L | 31.58% (36-78) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Puttergill vs S. Browne Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Calum Puttergill has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Scott Browne has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Calum Puttergill, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Scott Browne has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Calum Puttergill has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scott Browne has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Calum Puttergill has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Scott Browne winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Calum Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 38/34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Scott Browne has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 1/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 3/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Calum Puttergill has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Scott Browne has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Calum Puttergill winning 2 times and Scott Browne being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Calum Puttergill winning 4 and Scott Browne winning 0.
- The last match between Calum Puttergill and Scott Browne was at the Australia F8, 12-10-2015, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Calum Puttergill getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Calum Puttergill has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Scott Browne has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Calum Puttergill has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scott Browne has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Calum Puttergill has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scott Browne has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Calum Puttergill vs Scott Browne Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Puttergill vs S. Browne H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Puttergill 0%, Browne 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Puttergill 0%, Browne 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Puttergill 0%, Browne 0%.
C. Puttergill Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
S. Browne Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-0 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||

C. Puttergill vs S. Browne Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.13% (170/176) | YTD Win/Loss | 31.58% (36/78) |
| 49.24% (388/400) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.01% (84/163) |
| 50.02% (3589/3586) | Games Win/Loss | 42.90% (913/1215) |
| 48.24% (123/132) | Hard Win/Loss | 32.00% (32/68) |
| 52.78% (38/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 353 | Aces Total | 18 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1064 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 1:2:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 416 | Average Opponent Rank | 202.18 |
| 62% (8855/14246) | 1st Serve % | 60% (219/365) |
| 62% (5467/8855) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (136/219) |
| 43% (2341/5392) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (50/146) |
| 46% (715/1571) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (6/17) |
| 43% (6080/14225) | Return Points Win % | 31% (110/350) |
| 38.36% (28/45) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 52.01% (142/131) | Futures W/L | 33.33% (36/72) |
| 49% (169/344) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 31% (35/113) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (30/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (9/20) |
| 50% (48/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 87% (169/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (38/32) |
| 13% (169/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (38/6) |
| 13% (177/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (76/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:15 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:00
H2H 0-0
00:05
H2H 0-0
00:05
H2H 0-0
01:45
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece